|
The main focus of the IBR field development was on
cash crops such as potatoes, tomatoes, blueberries, cotton and corn.
In addition to those crops, IBR was introduced to the turf and horticulture
industries.
The main goal of these initial studies was to establish the following
parameters:
- Best application rate for different crops
- Ideal application method
- Timing of application
- Compatibility with other commonly used products
- Comparison to similar products
- Economics of IBR applications
The dry product is very easy to work with because it is easy to
mix with existing N-P-K components of nutrient management recommendations.
For example, in blueberries we substituted 25% of N-P-K input by
weight with the IBR dry product. Field application (spreading) was
accomplished without any difficulties. In this example we found
the ideal method of application as well as timing. The resulting
product was compatible with existing practices and the required
economic benefit to the grower was achieved.
A similar approach was used in the turf and horticulture industries.
With potatoes, the use of dry product is not as common but field
results from our studies are demonstrating economical benefits to
the growers.
The liquid product could be used on its own or mixed with existing
products. Products are constantly being developed to fit existing
commercial practices and applications. There is an observable trend
of synergy between the IBR liquid product and humic acid to different
biological inoculants.
A new product is under development as a result of field testing by Agriculture Canada. This product has proven fungicidal properties that are effective in treating crops for powdery mildew, one of the most serious common plant diseases.
|